Ways to Improve the Practice of Using Operational search Measures in the Investigation of Crimes Related to Human Trafficking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2026.06.20.06Keywords:
criminal justice, human rights, human trafficking, operational search measures, procedural justice, victim protection.Abstract
This paper analyses strategies to enhance the use of operational search tools in the investigation of human-trafficking offences. Monitoring suspected criminal activity, identification of trafficking networks, detection of recruitment, and location of victims are the focus of the study. It has a qualitative research design, legal and analytical. After initial screening, 113 sources were identified, 49 were used for analysis, and 35 and 29 studies were removed due to duplicates and irrelevance, respectively. The sources were organised into a document review matrix (Appendix A) based on geographical context, methodology, key findings, relevance of the research questions and emerging themes. The analysis found four key findings. First, operational search measures work best when they are intelligence-led that is, combining routes, digital platforms, recruitment patterns, business structures and exploitation networks. Second, these measures have direct rights implications as they can be used to identify and protect victims. However, they also have the potential to infringe on privacy, misclassify, criminalise, and exclude victims from access to support. Third, legal and practical limitations, such as a lack of guidance, inadequate training, corruption, stereotypes, poor coordination and barriers to digital evidence, impede the effectiveness and legality of investigations. Fourth, legal safeguards are needed, as well as trauma-informed policing, procedural justice, rules on digital evidence, anti-corruption measures, financial investigation capacity and organised victim-support systems. The study is important because it links the effectiveness of the investigation to the protection of human rights. It states that operational search measures should not be conceptualised as tools for law enforcement. They must be used and managed as legal, accountable, intelligence-led and rights-protective tools in the realm of human trafficking investigations.
References
Agwu, P. (2025). Re-Envisioning antihuman trafficking response in Nigeria through an anticorruption lens. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2025.2559537
Anguita-Olmedo, C. (2025). The convergence of trafficking and migrant smuggling in West Africa: Migration pressure factors and criminal actors. Social Sciences, 14(8), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14080447
Banarjee, S., Sadik, N., & Sharmin, S. (2025). Unveiling the nexus of trafficking: Socio-economic determinants, victimization forms, and psychological impacts on women in Bangladesh. Crime, Law and Social Change, 83(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-025-10199-5
Brunovskis, A. (2022). Identification work: Ambivalence, qualms and resistance in social workers’ identification of trafficking victims. International Social Work, 002087282211262. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221126263
Cameron, G., Farmer, C., Guala, T., Danby, M., Guadagno, B., Saligari, J., Masiero, E., Sharman, S., Curtis, A., Mildred, H., Button, K., Srivastava, J., Bereznicki, H., & Miller, P. (2026). Trauma-informed policing: A scoping review. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2026.2640597
Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: Cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), tyac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014
Christakis, T. (2020, July). EU-US negotiations on law enforcement access to data. In Contemporary Issues In Transatlantic Relations. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaa022
Clemente, M., Sierra-Rodríguez, A., & Cairns, D. (2024). Anti-trafficking professionals and institutionalized violence in Spain: An exploratory study. Social Sciences, 13(6), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060321
Cockbain, E., Ashby, M., Bowers, K., & Zhang, S. X. (2025). Concentrations of harm: Geographic and demographic patterning in human trafficking and related victimisation. Criminology & criminal justice, 25(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241245311
Cooper, F. I., van Bemmel, S. R., van der Leun, J. P., & Kunst, M. J. J. (2024). Factors that influence the criminal justice response to human trafficking: A systematic review of North American and European studies. Crime, law and social change, 82(3), 623-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10161-x
De Vries, I., Reid, J. A., & Farrell, A. (2023). From responding to uncertainties and ambiguities to more constructive and inclusive debates on commercial sex and sex trafficking. Victims & Offenders, 18(3), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2151539
Dean, L. A. (2025). Human trafficking dynamics and prevention efforts as an outcome of Russia’s war on Ukraine. Nationalities Papers, 53(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2024.49
Demeke, S. (2024). A human rights-based approach for effective criminal justice response to human trafficking. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-023-00143-4
Gaitis, K. K. (2023). Representations of traffickers in official UK discourse: Examining the least known component of the human trafficking equation. International journal of law, crime and justice, 74, 100592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100592
Gibbs, H. A., Williams, A., & Stoklosa, H. (2024). Health care and human trafficking: Improving the quality of policies and procedures in the United States health system. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2024.2386651
Green, S. T., Heys, A., & Barlow, C. (2026). The conducive environment: Reconceptualizing the exploitation of human beings. The British Journal of Criminology, 66(3), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf046
Haynes, J. (2025). International human rights law’s complicity in status subordination: A postcolonial critique of treaty bodies’ engagement with human trafficking. Leiden Journal of International Law, 38(4), 733-765. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156525100332
Hopkins, M., Keighley, R., & Sanders, T. (2024). Organised crime and the ecosystems of sexual exploitation in the United Kingdom: How supply and demand generate sexual exploitation and protection from prosecution. Trends in Organized Crime, 27(1), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09517-x
Islam, F. (2024). Human trafficking law enforcement over the victims and offenders: The perspective of anti-trafficking stakeholders. Victims & Offenders, 19(8), 1512-1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2227964
Jiménez-Lasserrotte, M. D. M., El Marbouhe El Faqyr, K., Escot, M. K. E. A., Rodas Vanegas, M. J., Granero-Molina, J., & Hernández-Padilla, J. M. (2025, November). Integrated health, social, and legal approaches to supporting migrant women victims of human trafficking and sexual violence. In Healthcare, 13,(22), 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222878
Johnson, K., Walling-Wefelmeyer, R., Smith, O., Hohl, K., & Brooks-Hay, O. (2025). Re-imagining procedural justice in policing sexual violence: Centring survivors. The British journal of criminology, 65(3), 639-657. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae060
Jovanović, M., Topp, V., & Fluhr, F. (2024). The hierarchy of victimhood: Prisons and states’ responsibility to protect every victim of modern slavery and human trafficking. International Criminology, 4(4), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-024-00152-2
Kjellgren, R. (2025). The geographies and complexities of online networks in the off-street sex market. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241245287
Kösl, C., Korntheuer, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2026). Not vulnerable enough for victim support?! Advancing the formal identification of human trafficking for labour exploitation through a multidimensional vulnerability approach. International Review of Victimology, 32(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580251369522
L’Hoiry, X., Moretti, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2024a). Embedding critical reflective practice in policing: reflections from a practitioner–academic collaboration in the context of technology-facilitated human trafficking. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18, 123. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae123
L’Hoiry, X., Moretti, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2024b). Human trafficking, sexual exploitation and digital technologies. Trends in organized crime, 27(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-024-09526-4
Landman, T., Brewster, B., & Thornton, S. (2024). Taking back control: Human rights and human trafficking in the United Kingdom. Societies, 14(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14040047
Lazarus, S., Chiang, M., & Button, M. (2025). Assessing human trafficking and cybercrime intersections through survivor narratives. Deviant Behavior, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2025.2470402
Leuprecht, C., Ferrill, J., Ozga, M., Tiwari, M., & Karunakaran, J. (2025). Detecting, disrupting and deterring sexual exploitation of trafficked persons: Leveraging beneficial ownership registries to reduce criminogenic information asymmetry and raise public expectations. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(2), 264-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2025.2466869
Lightowlers, C., Broad, R., & Gadd, D. (2021). Victims and suspects of modern slavery: Identifying subgroups using latent class analysis. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(2), 1384-1398. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa072
Matos, M., Sousa, J., Caridade, S., & Dias, I. (2025). Sexual exploitation: Professionals’ and stakeholders’ perceptions of prevention, assistance, and protection for victims in Portugal. Social Sciences, 14(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14030167
Mitchell, K. J., O’Brien, J. E., Jones, L. M., & Puchlopek-Adams, A. (2025). Law enforcement agency practices and policies for the investigation of child sex trafficking: Are agencies using victim-centered approaches?. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 50(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09776-6
Monastyrova, Y. (2026). Citizens as victims of human trafficking: Approaches to domestic trafficking in Spain, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. International Review of Victimology, 32(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580251361936
Moore, D. M. (2024). Algorithmic exploitation in social media human trafficking and strategies for regulation. Laws, 13(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13030031
Necchi, H., & Bradford, T. (2025). Examining the exploitation of vulnerable migrant populations and interventions to combat human trafficking and modern-day slavery within the illegal UK cannabis cultivation industry. Journal of Economic Criminology, 9, 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100175
O’Connell, M. (2026). A comparison of crime victims’ rights laws in six countries: For victims is it same, same but different? Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 9(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069261416575
Okorie, M. M., & Okeja, U. (2024). Prosecuting human traffickers in Nigeria: Victim-witnessing and community-oriented challenges. Trends in Organized Crime, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-024-09548-y
Pajon, L., & Walsh, D. (2025). Investigating organised human trafficking crimes: Case studies of police investigations in England. Police Practice and Research, 26(2), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.46793/lle25.048jc
Paterson, C., & Morgan, M. (2025). Procedural justice and therapeutic frameworks for police interactions with migrant populations experiencing forced labour. Social Sciences, 14(11), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14110638
Pinto, M. (2023). Discursive alignment of trafficking, rights and crime control. International Journal of Law in Context, 19(2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552322000209
Reid, J. A., & Fox, B. (2023). Reforming the criminal justice response to human trafficking victims and offenders: An introduction. Victims & Offenders, 18(3), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2182856
Reis, T. A., Gibbs, J. C., Howard, D., & Strohacker, E. R. (2022). Prostitute or human trafficking victim? Police discernment of human trafficking. Policing: An International Journal, 45(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-07-2021-0094
Schidlow, M. (2025). Forced fraud: The financial exploitation of human trafficking victims. Social Sciences, 14(7), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14070398
Schoultz, I., & Smiragina-Ingelström, P. (2023). Access to justice and social rights for victims of trafficking and labour exploitation in Sweden. In Transformations of European Welfare States and Social Rights: Regulation, Professionals, and Citizens (pp. 147-167). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46637-3_8
Sharkey, T. C., Martin, L., Ayler, T., Barrick, K., Forliti, T., Friedman, J., Maass, K. L., Mariotti, M., Nelson, C., & Tezcan, B. (2025). Realistic Computational Modeling of Human Trafficking Requires Lived Experience Experts. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2025.2561337
Sibley, M. A., & van der Meulen, E. (2022). Courting victims: Exploring the legal framing of exploitation in human trafficking cases. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 37(3), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2022.20
Sysoiev, D., Pidbereznykh, I., Mazur, H., Tellis, S., & Vandin, Y. (2024). Administrative law mechanisms for preventing and countering corruption in the field of territorial defence. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(4), Article e24069. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v5i4.859
Tezcan, B., & Maass, K. L. (2023). Human trafficking interdiction with decision dependent success. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 87, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101521
Yaman Kennedy, E. (2024). Child-centered anti-trafficking approaches in Mediterranean migration routes: Italy and Turkey. Social Sciences, 13(12), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13120700
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.