The Phenomenon of Congregational Graduation of PKH Recipients After the Labelling Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2024.12.20.05

Keywords:

Bener Meriah, Labeling Policy, Poverty Alleviation, Program Keluarga Harapan

Abstract

This study delves into the repercussions of labelling policies on the targeted delivery of benefits in the Bener Meriah Regency, Aceh, specifically within the Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) framework. Additionally, it aims to elucidate the factors influencing the voluntary exclusion of specific PKH recipients in Bener Meriah following the implementation of central government labelling policies. Employing a quantitative methodology, the researchers administered questionnaires to 76 respondents using snowball sampling and conducted a simple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 25. The findings of this analysis unveil a substantial correlation between labelling policies and the successful targeting of PKH implementation in Bener Meriah Regency, substantiated by a robust correlation coefficient of 0.954. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination, standing at 0.910, underscores that 91% of the variability can be ascribed to the influence of labelling policies. Despite these promising outcomes, the study accentuates challenges, particularly regarding the autonomous graduation of PKH recipients who have yet to transition into financially stable households. Given these insights, the researchers advocate for timely interventions by policymakers, facilitators, and social welfare workers involved in PKH. They propose the expedited attachment of follow-up labels or stickers to enhance monitoring and tracking. Moreover, the study recommends exercising discernment in granting independent graduation permissions and identifying potential PKH beneficiaries. These suggestions are poised to augment the precision and effectiveness of PKH targeting in Bener Meriah Regency, thereby amplifying the overall positive impact of the program on its intended recipients.

References

Aizawa, T. (2020). Joint impact of the conditional cash transfer on child nutritional status and household expenditure in Indonesia. Journal of Human Capital, 14(1), 122–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/708093

Arafat, A., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Pengentasan Kemiskinan Melalui Program PKH di Kabupaten Kolaka Timur (Studi di Kelurahan Atula) [Poverty alleviation through the PKH program in East Kolaka regency (Study in Atula village)]. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 2(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.22487/jpag.v2i1.39

Asbut, M. (2020, November 26). Labelisasi Sebagi Bentuk Transparansi PKH [Labeling as a form of PKH transparency]. Info Public. https://infopublik.sijunjung.go.id/labelisasi-sebagi-bentuk-transparansi-pkh/

Banerjee, D., & Klasen, S. (2022). Conditional cash transfers to mothers, intrahousehold allocations: the role of unobservability. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 16(1), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42495-021-00078-x

Buchory, A. (2019). Survei Tentang Pengaruh Pemasangan Stiker Labeling Miskin KPM PKH Terhadap Graduasi Mandiri dan Tekanan Patologi Sosial [Survey of the influence of installation of poor PKM labeling stickers on mandiri graduation and social pathology pressure]. Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 43(3), 219–226. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1682815

Daidone, S., Pellerano, L., Handa, S., & Davis, B. (2015). Is graduation from social safety nets possible? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Bulletin, 46(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12132

Dulkiah, M., Sari, A. L., & Irwandi, I. (2018). The impact of conditional cash transfer (CCT) to socio-economic of poor families: A case study. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, 7(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.2580

Eck, K., & Hatz, S. (2020). State surveillance and the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Human Rights, 19(5), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1816163

Faulana, I., Murniawaty, I., & Rusdarti, R. (2021). Model Pengentasan Kemiskinan Melalui Kebijakan PKH di Jawa Tengah [Poverty alleviation model through PKH policy in Central Java]. Oikos: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 5(1), 1–13. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/oikos/article/view/2956

Fitriani, E. (2020). Perbandingan Algoritma C4.5 dan Naïve Bayes untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan [Comparison of C4.5 and Naïve Bayes algorithms to determine eligibility for recipients of family hope program assistance]. SISTEMASI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v9i1.596

Hadna, A. H., & Kartika, D. (2017). Evaluation of poverty alleviation policy: Can conditional cash transfers improve the academic performance of poor students in Indonesia?. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), Article 1295548. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1295548

Hasyem, M., Larasati, E., Suwitri, S., & Warsono, H. (2022). Implementation of distribution and determination of village funds (Case study in Syamtalira Bayu, Aceh Utara Regency). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i2.738

Kamalussin, L. O. A., Misnawati, A., Hartawati, H., Rahman, R., Yusriadi, Y., Hutapea, R. H., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2021, March 7). Inhibiting factors (internal & external) implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Bone regency. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 6269–6275). IEOM Society International. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353347514

Khan, A. R., & Rahman, M. M. (2017). The role of evaluation at the stages of policy formulation, implementation, and impact assessment. Agathos: An International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 173–186. https://www.agathos-international-review.com/issues/2017/14/Khan.pdf

Kusuma, D., Thabrany, H., Hidayat, B., McConnell, M., Berman, P., & Cohen, J. (2017). New evidence on the impact of large-scale conditional cash transfers on child vaccination rates: The case of a clustered-randomized trial in Indonesia. World Development, 98, 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.007

Ladhani, S., & Sitter, K. C. (2020). Conditional cash transfers: A critical review. Development Policy Review, 38(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12416

Lenel, F., Priebe, J., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2022). Can mHealth campaigns improve CCT outcomes? Experimental evidence from SMS-nudges in Indonesia. Journal of Health Economics, 86, Article 102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102687

Maulana, I. D., Jainuri, J., & Hardini, H. K. (2019). “Good governing poverty alleviation” through the PKH policy—Independent women’s groups in poverty reduction in Batu City (Study at Batu City Social Service). Journal of Local Government Issues (LOGOS), 2(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.vol2.no2.193-209

Muttakin, F., Nadim Fatwa, K., & Sarbaini, S. (2021). Implementasi Additive Ratio Assessment Model untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Manfaat Program Keluarga Harapan [Implementation of additive ratio assessment model for recommendation of beneficiaries of family hope program]. SITEKIN: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi Dan Industri, 19(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v19i1.14786

Nugroho, A., Amir, H., Maududy, I., & Marlina, I. (2021). Poverty eradication programs in Indonesia: Progress, challenges and reforms. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(6), 1204–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.05.002

Pereira, M., & Oliveira, A. M. (2020). Poverty and food insecurity may increase as the threat of COVID-19 spreads. Public Health Nutrition, 23(17), 3236–3240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020003493

Pratama, F. F., & Chandra, D. (2022). Dampak Strategis Upaya Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Masyarakat Perkotaan pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 melalui Program PKH di Kota Tasikmalaya [Strategic impact of urban community poverty alleviation efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic through the PKH program in Tasikmalaya city]. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v8i1.41238

Puteri, G. C. (2021). Pentingnya Penguatan Mekanisme dan Instrumen Resertifikasi/Graduasi KPM PKH [The importance of strengthening the mechanism and instruments for recertification/graduation of PKH beneficiary families]. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan, 3(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.7454/jsht.v3i2.140

Rizkillah, R., & Simanjuntak, M. (2018). Allocation of expenditure of poor family as a recipient of Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Journal of Family Sciences E, 3(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.3.1.41-52

Silva, M. M. de S. e. (2017). Poverty reduction, education, and the global diffusion of conditional cash transfers. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53094-9

Sofianto, A. (2020). Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Provinsi Jawa Tengah [Implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Central Java province]. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 10(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v10i1.2091

Sofianto, A., Diyanayati, K., & Kundarto, S. A. (2014). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (Studi Kasus Unit Pelayanan Terpadu Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (UPTPK) Kabupaten Sragen) [Public service innovation in poverty alleviation (Case study of the integrated poverty alleviation service unit (UPTPK) of Sragen regency)]. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 12(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.36762/jurnaljateng.v12i2.353

Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D [Educational research methods: Quantitative, qualitative and R&D approaches]. Alfabeta.

Suleman, S. A., & Resnawaty, R. (2017). Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Antara perlindungan sosial dan pengentasan kemiskinan [Family Hope Program (PKH): Between social protection and poverty alleviation]. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 88–92. https://www.academia.edu/download/85615405/6876.pdf

Syamsulhakim, E., & Khadijah, N. (2021). Graduating from a conditional cash transfer program in Indonesia: Results of a household survey of prosperous-independent graduates of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in 2020. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36784

Syukri, M., Arif, S., Rosfadhila, M., & Isdijoso, W. (2010). Making the best of all resources: How Indonesian household recipients use the CCT allowance. IDS Bulletin, 41(4), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00155.x

Triyana, M., & Shankar, A. H. (2017). The effects of a household conditional cash transfer programme on coverage and quality of antenatal care: A secondary analysis of Indonesia’s pilot programme. BMJ Open, 7(10), Article e014348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014348

Velázquez Leyer, R. (2020). Democracy and new ideas in Latin American social policy: the origins of conditional cash transfers in Brazil and Mexico. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 36(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2018.1526697

Venkatesan, P. (2020). COVID-19 diagnostics-not at the expense of other diseases. The Lancet Microbe, 1(2), Article e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30041-0

Villa, J. M., & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2019). Poverty dynamics and graduation from conditional cash transfers: a transition model for Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera program. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 17(2), 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-018-9399-5

Waluyo, B., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2021). Hubungan program keluarga harapan (PKH) dengan tingkat kemiskinan di daerah tertinggal dan non tertinggal di Indonesia [The relationship between the Family Hope Program (PKH) and poverty levels in underdeveloped and non-underdeveloped areas in Indonesia]. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i4.437

Downloads

Published

2024-10-09

How to Cite

Andriani, W., Herizal, & Rassanjani, S. (2024). The Phenomenon of Congregational Graduation of PKH Recipients After the Labelling Policy. Futurity of Social Sciences, 2(4), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2024.12.20.05